What is the primary implication of being 'obstinate' during a discussion?

Being 'obstinate' during a discussion primarily implies a refusal to be persuaded. This term describes an individual's stubbornness or unwillingness to change their opinion or position, even when presented with new information or arguments. When someone is obstinate, they typically hold firmly to their beliefs, making it challenging to engage in productive dialogue or reach a consensus.

The other options suggest a level of flexibility or openness that contradicts the essence of obstinacy. For instance, the idea of willingness to collaborate or seeking compromise both inherently require a degree of adaptability and openness to others' viewpoints, which is not characteristic of being obstinate. Similarly, being open to new ideas implies a readiness to consider alternative perspectives, which is fundamentally at odds with the obstinate disposition. Thus, the correct answer highlights the defining characteristic of obstinacy in discussions.